John Bean is a veteran of the nationalist movements in the United Kingdom in the 1960s. Alternative Right published a lengthy interview with him by Colin Liddell which I found fascinating, even though I had not heard of most of the men mentioned, including Bean himself; it was enough to get me to buy the book and read it.
Blood in the Square: Life, Love and Political Conflict in Sixties Britain is Bean’s fictionalized account of those days. The book is a quick read, and Bean’s talent is in distilling all the reasons for rightist failure into a simple, readable, fairly entertaining account. From the preface:
Blood in the Square takes the reader inside the nationalist movements of the mid-sixties vying for support on the anti-immigration bandwagon. Importantly, it tells you what these people were like, what they thought and how they lived. Much of this is based on the author’s experiences.
The plot revolves around one Victor Blackwood, an activist in the Nationalist Action Movement (NAM) who travels about meeting with other activists and making speeches while his marriage crumbles. Other prominent characters are Alan Laudersby, a young chemist drawn to the NAM but wary of anti-Semitism and violence; Charles Barnet, and old veteran activist happy to mix it up; David Pearman, a leftist journalist (but I repeat myself); Len Norris, one of Blackwood’s guards; and Harris, a NAM follower but also a low-life. Speeches and meetings are menaced by mobs of “Trots”.
The salient characteristics of the story are:
- The difficulty of mobilizing a movement in the face of a culture dominated by leftism and all its works;
- Social and employment pressures working against anyone joining the nationalist right;
- Fractures in the right, with associated infighting;
- A movement whose audience is described thusly: “They ranged from the near criminally insane, via social misfits to ordinary people worried about the change that mass immigration was giving.”
- The pervasiveness of violence, mostly initiated by the left, but almost always blamed on the right.
There is no happy ending; the efforts failed, just look at the United Kingdom today. One wonders if Bean simply took today’s environment and anachronistically imposed it on his time in the ’60s, so much of it rings eerily familiar. That was 50 years ago, the collapse still moves to the same beat.
Wherever you may fall in the disaffected right, you can see we face the same challenges today. Blood in the Square describes failed efforts to build a following. The problem with trying to build a following is that, while most people are followers, they have already been led somewhere by our hostile elites. The chances of getting their attention and leading them somewhere else are low indeed. I commend efforts to cultivate an alternative elite, because that is what will be needed as our nation unravels.